Full Lenght Article
Attaining Gender Equality in Post-Conflict Society: the Inexorable Course to Sustainable Peace-Building

Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access


Ethnic, political, historical, economic, social and gender tensions within countries, and the quest for dominance by state and non-state actors are subsumed in a quantum of deleterious consequences. Despite, rivalry among global superpowers, there is no evidence of a decline in regional disputes or in organised violence by ethnic groups, religious fundamentalists, banditry, secessionist movements or terrorists. These internal conflicts are made more complex and lethal by modern technology and communications, international collaborations and the proliferation of cheap, but destructive weapons in the hands of young people. Contemporary conflict portends aggravated vulnerability of civilians, defined along gender and age strands, where women, girls, children and the aged are the most abused, raped, widowed, discriminated, debased and dehumanised. They are despondent, subjugated, traumatised and denied access to social good, status, education, health and equal rights - the fundamentals of equitable and just society. While data are derivatives of qualitative method, strands of feminist and social action perspectives offered latitude for theoretical analysis. It is alluded in the paper that peace-building in the post-conflict era would be elusive and ephemeral if gender equality is not actualised through social investment, gender intersectionality, masculinity connectivity, criminalisation of gender discrimination and violence.


Gender equality
post-conflict society
gender violence


Conflict of Interest Statement

The author (s) declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.


1. Abdullahi G. K. (2015). Gender discrimination and feminism in Nigeria. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 3(7).
2. Amadi, B. (1982). Ethics in Nigerian culture. Heinemann Educational Books.
3. Awak, E. U. (2015). Women traders, gender relations and development. In A. S. Ukommi, D. E. Okon, & L. O. Udensi (Eds.), Sustainable Development in Nigeria: Strategic and Innovative Options. Lambert Academic Publishing.
4. Awak, E. U. (2013a). Changing role of the family, child development and terrorism in Nigeria. Reiko International Journal of Social and Economic Research, 6(3), 82-99.
5. Awak, E. U. (2013b). The import and challenges of information and communication technologies in conflict management and resolution. Ikot Osurua Journal of Inter-Disciplinary Studies, 3(1).
6. Baksh-Soodeen, R. (2004). Gender mainstreaming in conflict transformation: Gender mainstreaming in post-conflict reconstruction. The Commonwealth, 82-98.
7. Breslin, J. (2019). Iraqi women as legally vulnerable subjects: Applying gender-mainstreaming and vulnerability theory in the post-conflict Iraqi State. Emory International Law Review, 33(2).
8. Chaudron, C. (2019). Gender equality in post-conflict reconstruction: Three primary challenges and corresponding approaches. The Nuremberg Human Rights Center (NMRZ).
9. Chow, E. N., Segal, M. T., & Lin, T. (2011). Analyzing gender, intersectionality, and multiple inequalities: Global, transnational and local contexts. Volume 15 of Advances in Gender Research. Emerald Group Publishing.
10. Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (2002). On the incidence of civil war in Africa. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(1).
11. Cornwall, A., Erdström, J., & Greig, A. (2011). Men and development: Politicizing masculinities. Zed Books.
12. Date-Bah, E. (1996, May). Sustainable peace after war: Arguing the need for major integration of gender perspectives in post-conflict programming. ILO.
13. ECOSOC (2010, April, 19-30). Summary and recommendations of the report of the mission of the permanent forum on indigenous issues to the Plurinational State of Bolivia. Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, Ninth session.United Nations.
14. EI Bushra, J., & Lopez, E. P. (1993). Development in conflict: The gender dimension. In Oxfam Discussion Paper 3.
15. Elwell, F. W. (2013). Sociocultural systems: Principles of structure and change. Athabasca University Press.
16. Gane, N. (2005). Max Weber as social theorist: ‘Class, status, party’. European Journal of Social Theory, 8(2), 211-226.
17. Handrahan, L. (2004, December). Conflict, Gender, Ethnicity and Post-Conflict Reconstruction. Sage Journals.
18. Haralambos, M., Holborn, M., & Heald, R. (2013). Sociology, themes and perspectives, (8th Edition). Harper Collins Publishers.
19. Haslanger, S. (1995). Ontology and social construction. philosophical topics, 23, 99-125.
20. Hossain, N. (2012, March). Security and the pathways of women’s empowerment: Findings from a thematic synthesis of the pathways of women’s empowerment research. Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex.
21. Jones, P., Bradbury, L., & LeBoutillier, S. (2011). Introducing social theory. Polity.
22. McKay, S. (2010). Reconstructing fragile lives: Girls’ social reintegration in northern Uganda and Sierra Leone. Peacebuilding and Reconstruction 3.
23. MacKenzie, M. (2009). Securitization and desecuritization: Female soldiers and the reconstruction of women in post-conflict Sierra Leone. Security Studies, 18(2).
24. Mikkola, M. (2019). Feminist perspectives on sex and gender. E. N. Zaita (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/feminism-gender/.
25. Moser, C. O. N. (1993). Gender planning and development: Theory, practice, and training. Routledge.
26. Peet, R., & Hartwick, E. (2009). Theories of development: Contentions, arguments, alternatives, (Second Edition). The Guilford Press.
27. Pugh, M. (2005). The political economy of peacebuilding: A critical theory perspective. International Journal of Peace Studies.
28. UNDP (2002). Gender approaches in conflict and post-conflict situations. Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery (BCPR).
29. Weber, M. (1988/1929). Max Weber: A biography. Transaction Books.
30. World Economic Forum (2017). The global gender gap report. Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-gender-gap-report-2017
31. World Bank (2011). World development report 2012: Gender equality and development. The World Bank.

Bibliographic Information

Verify authenticity via CrossMark
  • Submitted
    17 September 2022
  • Revised
    17 September 2022
  • Published
    17 September 2022