Principles for the Authorities on Activities with Controlled Transactions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51699/ajdes.v30i.732Keywords:
principles for the authorities, controlled transactionsAbstract
Principles for the authorities on activities with controlled transactions are based on the examination of the utility of the economy and the maximization of the utility of companies of controlled transactions. This paper shows the conclusions about the key elements which authorities and on the other hand the companies of controlled transactions should follow to maximize their utility. Therefore, based on the analysis of the cycle of money are presented significant bullets about the issue of the cycle of money, showing both sides. Then, it is determined that there is a contra behavior between the authorities and the entrepreneurs who participate in controlled transactions.
References
Acs, Z. J., & Szerb, L. (2007). Entrepreneurship, economic growth and public policy. Small Business Economics, 28(2–3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9012-3
Adhikari, A., Derashid, C., & Zhang, H. (2006). Public policy, political connections, and effective tax rates: Longitudinal evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2006.07.001
Berchin, I. I., Nunes, N. A., de Amorim, W. S., Alves Zimmer, G. A., da Silva, F. R., Fornasari, V. H., Sima, M., & de Andrade Guerra, J. B. S. O. (2019). The contributions of public policies for strengthening family farming and increasing food security: The case of Brazil. Land Use Policy, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.043
Bowling, S. J., Boyland, L. G., & Kirkeby, K. M. (2019). Property Tax Cap Policy in Indiana and Implications for Public School Funding Equity. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 15(9). https://doi.org/10.22230/ijepl.2019v15n9a881
Bredas Andreas. (2021). ΕΝΔΟΟΜΙΛΙΚΕΣ ΣΥΝΑΛΛΑΓΕΣ. Η ΜΕΘΟΛΟΓΙΑ ΤΕΚΜΗΡΙΩΣΗΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΑ ΠΡΟΒΛΗΜΑΤΑ ΤΗΡΗΣΗΣ ΤΗΣ ΑΡΧΗΣ ΤΩΝ ΙΣΩΝ ΑΠΟΣΤΑΣΕΩΝ ΣΕ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΕΣ ΕΤΑΙΡΙΕΣ. In University of Thessaly. https://ir.lib.uth.gr/xmlui/?locale-attribute=en
Challoumis, C. (2018a). Methods of Controlled Transactions and the Behavior of Companies According to the Public and Tax Policy. In Economics (Vol. 6, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2018-0003
Challoumis, C. (2018b). Q.E. (Quantification of Everything ) Method and Econometric Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3150101
Challoumis, C. (2019a). The cycle of money with and without the escaped savings. Ekonomski Signali, 14(1), 89–99. https://doi.org/336.76 336.741.236.5
Challoumis, C. (2019b). Theoretical analysis of fuzzy logic and Q. E. method in economics. IKBFU’s Vestnik, 2019(01), 59–68. https://doi.org/330.42
Challoumis, C. (2020). Analysis of the Theory of Cycle of Money. Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionalis, 23(2), 13–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2478/acta-2020-0004
Challoumis, C. (2021a). Chain of cycle of money. Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionalis, 24(2).
Challoumis, C. (2021b). Index of the Cycle of Money - The Case of Latvia. Economics and Culture, 17(2), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.2478/jec-2020-0015
de Vasconcelos, F. de A. G., Machado, M. L., de Medeiros, M. A. T., Neves, J. A., Recine, E., & Pasquim, E. M. (2019). Public policies of food and nutrition in Brazil: From Lula to Temer. Revista de Nutricao, 32. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-9865201932e180161
Delgado Rodríguez, M. J., & de Lucas Santos, S. (2018). Speed of economic convergence and EU public policy. Cuadernos de Economia, 41(115). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesjef.2017.01.001
Hagenaars, L. L., Jeurissen, P. P. T., & Klazinga, N. S. (2017). The taxation of unhealthy energy-dense foods (EDFs) and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs): An overview of patterns observed in the policy content and policy context of 13 case studies. In Health Policy (Vol. 121, Issue 8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.06.011
Income taxes, public fiscal policy and economic growth. (2014). E-Finanse, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.14636/1734-039X_10_3_001
Jensen, P. H. (2020). Experiments and evaluation of public policies: Methods, implementation, and challenges. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 79(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12406
Johnston, C. D., & Ballard, A. O. (2016). Economists and public opinion: Expert consensus and economic policy judgments. Journal of Politics, 78(2). https://doi.org/10.1086/684629
Pircher, B. (2020). EU public procurement policy: the economic crisis as trigger for enhanced harmonisation. Journal of European Integration, 42(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1666114
Suslov, V. I., & Basareva, V. G. (2020). ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC POLICY: SCANDINAVIA AND SIBERIA. Interexpo GEO-Siberia, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.33764/2618-981x-2020-3-1-209-218
Waardenburg, M., Groenleer, M., & De Jong, J. (2020). Designing environments for experimentation, learning and innovation in public policy and governance. Policy and Politics, 48(1). https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15586040837640
Wangsness, P. B., Proost, S., & Rødseth, K. L. (2020). Vehicle choices and urban transport externalities. Are Norwegian policy makers getting it right? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102384
