Effect of Marketing Mix on Decisions to Add Customer Electricity (Case Study in Pt Pln (Persero) Tolitoli Customer Service Implementation Unit)

Authors

  • Muhammad Rajavalens Master of Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business Sam Ratulangi University, Manado 95115, Indonesia
  • SLHV Joyce Lapian Master of Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business Sam Ratulangi University, Manado 95115, Indonesia
  • Arrazi Hasan Jan Master of Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business Sam Ratulangi University, Manado 95115, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51699/ajdes.v22i.582

Keywords:

Marketing Mix, Decision, Customer Service

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of Product Marketing Mix (X1), Price (X2), Place (X3), and Promotion (X4) on the Decision to Add Electricity to Customers (Y) at PT PLN (Persero) UP3 Tolitoli. The test results conclude that the Product Factor has a positive effect on Purchase Decisions but is not significant. The probability of this variable is 0.373, which is greater than the 0.05 significance level, so the effect of Product Factor on Purchase Decision is not significant. The test results show that the Price Factor has a positive and significant effect on Purchase Decision. This is obtained from the p-value which is less than a significance level of 0.05, which is 0.001. Place has a positive and significant effect on purchasing decisions. This is because the probability value of 0.002 is smaller than the significance level of 0.05. Promotion has a positive and significant effect on purchasing decisions. This is because the probability value is less than the 0.05 significance level, which is 0.012. Consumers have a positive effect on purchasing decisions but not significant. The probability of this variable is 0.469 which is greater than the 0.05 significance level so that the influence of consumers on purchasing decisions is not significant. The process has a positive and significant effect on purchasing decisions. This is because the probability value is less than the 0.05 significance level, which is 0.025. The resulting R-Square value is 0.571. This means that the product factors, place factors, price factors, promotion factors, people factors and process factors contribute 57.1 percent in explaining their relationship to the purchasing decision variables. While the remaining 42.9 percent are influenced by other variables outside the model. The probability of this variable is 0.469 which is greater than the 0.05 significance level so that the influence of consumers on purchasing decisions is not significant. The process has a positive and significant effect on purchasing decisions. This is because the probability value is less than the 0.05 significance level, which is 0.025. The resulting R-Square value is 0.571. This means that the product factors, place factors, price factors, promotion factors, people factors and process factors contribute 57.1 percent in explaining their relationship to the purchasing decision variables. While the remaining 42.9 percent are influenced by other variables outside the model. The probability of this variable is 0.469 which is greater than the 0.05 significance level so that the influence of consumers on purchasing decisions is not significant. The process has a positive and significant effect on purchasing decisions. This is because the probability value is less than the 0.05 significance level, which is 0.025. The resulting R-Square value is 0.571. This means that the product factors, place factors, price factors, promotion factors, people factors and process factors contribute 57.1 percent in explaining their relationship to the purchasing decision variables. While the remaining 42.9 percent are influenced by other variables outside the model. The process has a positive and significant effect on purchasing decisions. This is because the probability value is less than the 0.05 significance level, which is 0.025. The resulting R-Square value is 0.571. This means that the product factors, place factors, price factors, promotion factors, people factors and process factors contribute 57.1 percent in explaining their relationship to the purchasing decision variables. While the remaining 42.9 percent are influenced by other variables outside the model. The process has a positive and significant effect on purchasing decisions. This is because the probability value is less than the 0.05 significance level, which is 0.025. The resulting R-Square value is 0.571. This means that the product factors, place factors, price factors, promotion factors, people factors and process factors contribute 57.1 percent in explaining their relationship to the purchasing decision variables. While the remaining 42.9 percent are influenced by other variables outside the model. People Factors and Process Factors contributed 57.1 percent in explaining their relationship to the Purchasing Decision variable. While the remaining 42.9 percent are influenced by other variables outside the model. People Factors and Process Factors contributed 57.1 percent in explaining their relationship to the Purchasing Decision variable. While the remaining 42.9 percent are influenced by other variables outside the model.

References

Ajija, Shochrul Rohmatul. 2011. Smart Ways to Master Eviews. Salemba Four. Jakarta, Indonesia

Alma, Buchari. 2016. Marketing Management and Service Marketing. Alphabet. Bandung, Indonesia

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Research Procedures A Practical Approach. Revised edition V. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta, Indonesia

Ghozali, Imam. 2016. Application of Multivariete Analysis With IBM SPSS 23 Program (8th Edition). VIII Printing. Diponegoro University Publishing Agency. Semarang, Indonesia

Ghozali, Imam. 2018. Application of Multivariate Analysis with IBM SPSS 25 Program. Diponegoro University Publishing Agency. Semarang, Indonesia

Juliandi, Azuar., and Saprinal Manurung. 2014. Business Research Methods. UMSU Press. Medan, Indonesia

Kotler, Phillip., and Gary Armstrong. 2014. Principles of Marketing 15th edition. Pearson Pretice Hall. New Jersey, United States

Kotler, Phillip., and Gary Armstrong. 2016. Principles of Marketing Sixteenth Edition Global Edition. Pearson Education limited. London, England

Kotler, Phillip., and Gary Armstrong. 2018. Principles of Marketing Global Edition 17th Edition. Pearson Education limited. London, England

Kotler, Phillip., and Kevin Keller. 2015. Marketing Management, Volumes 1 & 2, Edition 13. Erlangga. Jakarta, Indonesia

Kotler, Phillip., and Kevin Keller. 2016. Marketing Management, Volumes 1 & 2, Edition 12. PT Index. Jakarta, Indonesia

Lupiyoadi, Rambat. 2013. Competency-Based Service Marketing Management (3rd Edition). Salemba Four. Jakarta, Indonesia

Moleong, Lexy J. (2017). Qualitative Research Methods, 36th printing. PT Youth Rosdakarya Offset. Bandung, Indonesia

Indonesian government. 2009. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 30 of 2009 concerning Electricity. State Secretariat. Jakarta, Indonesia

PT PLN (Persero). 2015. Decree of the Board of Directors of PT PLN (Persero) Number 1336.K/DIR/2011 concerning Guidelines for the Customer Service Process. PT PLN (Persero). Jakarta, Indonesia

PT PLN (Persero). 2015. Regulation of the Board of Directors of PT PLN (Persero) Number 0017.P/DIR/2015 concerning Program for Improvement and Control of Electricity Sales. PT PLN (Persero). Jakarta, Indonesia

Sita, Agustina. 2011. Marketing Management. UB Press. Malang, Indonesia

Siyoto, Sandu., and Ali Sodik. 2015. Basic Research Methodology. Media Literacy Publishing. Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Sugiyono. 2013. Quantitative, qualitative & R&D research methods. Alphabet. Bandung, Indonesia

Yapanto, A. M. (2022). Implementation of Sharia Economics in Indonesian Banking. c.

Sugiyono. 2014. Qualitative Quantitative Research Methods and R&D. Alphabet. Bandung, Indonesia

Sugiyono. 2015. Research & Development Methods. Alphabet. Bandung, Indonesia

Sugiyono. 2016. Qualitative Quantitative Research Methods and R&D. Alphabet. Bandung, Indonesia

Yapanto, L. M., Diah, A. M., Kankaew, K., Dewi, A. K., Dextre-Martinez, W. R., Kurniullah, A. Z., & Villanueva-Benites, L. A. (2021). The effect of crm on employee performance in banking industry. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 9(2), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2021.3.003

Downloads

Published

2022-10-13

How to Cite

Rajavalens, M. ., Lapian, S. J. ., & Jan, A. H. . (2022). Effect of Marketing Mix on Decisions to Add Customer Electricity (Case Study in Pt Pln (Persero) Tolitoli Customer Service Implementation Unit). Academic Journal of Digital Economics and Stability, 22, 70–82. https://doi.org/10.51699/ajdes.v22i.582

Issue

Section

Articles